2👍
✅
I’ve tried with a parameter called
constant_memory
but it doesn’t seem to make a difference.
It should do. As shown in the XlsxWriter Documentation the constant_memory
option keeps the memory usage constant and small.
So if it doesn’t make a difference to your application then maybe the issue isn’t with XlsxWriter and something else is consuming the memory.
Can you verify that by commenting out all calls to worksheet.write()
and running the test again.
Source:stackexchange.com