[Django]-Why did Django 1.9 replace tuples () with lists [] in settings and URLs?

It is explained in issue #8846 (emphasis mine):

In the documentation for ​Creating your own settings there’s a
recommendation which reads “For settings that are sequences, use
tuples instead of lists. This is purely for performance.”

This is bunk. Profiling shows that tuples run no faster than lists for
most operations (certainly looping, which we are likely to do most
often). On the other hand, list-literal syntax has the advantage that
it doesn’t collapse to a single value when you have a single item and
omit the trailing comma, like tuple syntax. Using list syntax is no
slower, more legible and less error prone. An often-expressed view in
the wider Python community seems that tuples should not be considered
as immutable lists. They are intended as fixed-length records – indeed
the mathematical concept of a tuple is quite distinct from that of a
sequence.

Also see this answer for a more up-to-date discussion.

Another answer (not directly related to this issue) demonstrates that accessing elements is actually faster with a list.

Update and further information: It is correct that the above issue was closed years ago, but I included it because it explained the rationale behind the decision and many similar discussions refer to the same ticket. The actual implementation decision was triggered after the following discussion on django-developers started by core Django developer Aymeric Augustin:

I prefer them [lists] for two reasons:

1) All these settings are sequences of similar things. Such values are
best represented with lists, unless they have to be immutable, in
which case a tuple can be used. (tuples are both “namedtuples without
names” and “immutable lists” in Python.)

2) Lists aren’t prone to the “missing comma in single-item tuple”
problem which bites beginners and experienced pythonistas alike.
Django even has code to defend against this mistake for a handful of
settings. Search for “tuple_settings” in the source.

And the switch to lists actually happened in issue #24149 which also referred to the above discussion.