6đź‘Ť
Try setting the ids manually. To prevent race conditions, make sure to wrap the function as a single transaction.
from django.db import transaction, models
@transaction.commit_on_success
def bulk_create_with_manual_ids(foo_list):
id_start = (Foo.objects.all().aggregate(models.Max('id'))['id__max'] or 0) + 1
for i,foo in enumerate(foo_list): foo.id = id_start + i
return Foo.objects.bulk_create(foo_list)
objList = [Foo(),Foo(),Foo()]
foo_objects = bulk_create_with_manual_ids(objList)
Bar(foo=foo_objects[0]).save()
Note that this approach is unsuitable for any table that has a serial
field or other auto-incrementing in-database generated key. The key will not be incremented by the bulk create since IDs are being generated on the Django side.
👤egafni
3đź‘Ť
For the first question, no you won’t be able to do that, because obj
won’t have its primary key set so couldn’t be used as a foreign key.
The second question, no that’s not what it says at all. It specifically mentions “multi-table inheritance”: inheriting from an abstract model is not multi-table inheritance.
👤Daniel Roseman
- Can I have multiple lists in a Django generic.ListView?
- Django Signals in celery
- Python multiprocessing Pool hangs on ubuntu server
- Django: Custom User Model fields not appearing in Django admin
- Django-cms for multiple websites
Source:stackexchange.com