[Django]-Django BigInteger auto-increment field as primary key?

Django now has a BigAutoField built in if you are using Django 1.10:

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.10/ref/models/fields/#bigautofield

Inspired by lf*gundes but with a small but important correction:

class BigAutoField(fields.AutoField):
    def db_type(self, connection):  # pylint: disable=W0621
        if 'mysql' in connection.__class__.__module__:
            return 'bigint AUTO_INCREMENT'
        return super(BigAutoField, self).db_type(connection)

add_introspection_rules([], [r"^a\.b\.c\.BigAutoField"])

Notice instead of extending BigIntegerField, I am extending AutoField. This is an important distinction. With AutoField, Django will retrieve the AUTO INCREMENTed id from the database, whereas BigInteger will not.

One concern when changing from BigIntegerField to AutoField was the casting of the data to an int in AutoField.

Notice from Django’s AutoField:

def to_python(self, value):
    if value is None:
        return value
    try:
        return int(value)
    except (TypeError, ValueError):
        msg = self.error_messages['invalid'] % str(value)
        raise exceptions.ValidationError(msg)

and

def get_prep_value(self, value):
    if value is None:
        return None
    return int(value)

It turns out this is OK, as verified in a python shell:

>>> l2 = 99999999999999999999999999999
>>> type(l2)
<type 'long'>
>>> int(l2)
99999999999999999999999999999L
>>> type(l2)
<type 'long'>
>>> type(int(l2))
<type 'long'>

In other words, casting to an int will not truncate the number, nor will it change the underlying type.

NOTE: This answer as modified, according to Larry’s code. Previous solution extended fields.BigIntegerField, but better to extend fields.AutoField

I had the same problem and solved with following code:

from django.db.models import fields
from south.modelsinspector import add_introspection_rules

class BigAutoField(fields.AutoField):
    def db_type(self, connection):
        if 'mysql' in connection.__class__.__module__:
            return 'bigint AUTO_INCREMENT'
        return super(BigAutoField, self).db_type(connection)

add_introspection_rules([], ["^MYAPP\.fields\.BigAutoField"])

Apparently this is working fine with south migrations.

You could alter the table afterwards. That may be a better solution.

As stated before you could alter the table afterwards. That is a good solution.

To do that without forgetting, you can create a management module under your application package and use the post_syncdb signal.

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/signals/#post-syncdb

This can cause django-admin.py flush to fail. But it is still the best alternative I know.

I also had the same problem. Looks like there is no support for BigInteger auto fields in django.

I’ve tried to create some custom field BigIntegerAutoField but I faced a problem with south migration system (south couldn’t create sequence for my field).

After giving a try couple of different approaches I decided to follow Matthew’s advice and do alter table (e.g. ALTER TABLE table_name ALTER COLUMN id TYPE bigint; in postgre)

Would be great to have solution supported by django (like built in BigIntegerAutoField) and south.